Posted on Jul 26th, 2009
by
sarva
teaching the humming birds
words
to a song
that speaks of the old
to the new,
less than useless.
from them, i learn
the importance
of living on nectar
and traveling light.
Access: Public
Print
views (38)
Posted on Aug 25th, 2008
by
sarva
credit to the findhorn foundation for this picture.
mother Earth is so careless, scattering things like seeds, shed leaves and people to the wind, leaving things out in all weathers to fade or bake in the sun, shiver, become brittle in the killing chill or to be drenched in drowning downpour.
naturally, we who are a little lower than the angels, run away from the lightest rain shower, sprinklers timed to water our lawns at strategic and convenient times. or we cower before the malignant sun, lying in tanning beds for brief doses of man made improvement while creating the most ironic consequences; being dedicated only to our own will and comfort, we tear sardonic holes in the sky by refrigerating the air, hairspray made contraband while the prime offender goes off scoffing, scot free.
we whitened, weary weaklings hide inside, huddle near our fear and curse Her for Her will power, antibiotically intent never to challenge our anemic (or self-effacing) immune systems, which in truth are overburdened by carcinogenic toxins. we avenge ourselves against an image of a less-than-human enemy, brute, naked, matted hair, homeless, stinking, filthy, savagely ignorant, a tarry heart clad in ashes, knee deep in a very gritty reality, he never inclines toward cleanliness, which is clearly next to godliness. but we eat crude oil, which catabolizes the carbon soot-charred marble of masterpieces with insidious carbonic-sulfuric-acid byproducts of our infernal combustion. and truth be told, the brute is in us, paragon of animals, culmination of evolution, prime mover of the sixth mass extinction. and loss and degradation mount a glorious peak of triumph.
who is laughing for argument's sake? what rhetoric will take us down? only our own momentum has the onus and impetus enough. divided against itself, the argument is resolved.
who is laughing?
Access: Public
Print
views (132)
Posted on Nov 9th, 2007
by
sarva
again, ok.
there is order in chaos.
life emerges from something that seems to be unconscious and unliving.
this apparently unliving substrate in which you live is not at all unconscious or unliving .
now, you ignore what anger might come your way, even though the earth is crying -
screaming like a stuck pig, as my father used to say.
now, we judge what ever comes our way, and we ask "will this serve me?"
what?
...serve me>serve me... serve me? serve me, now.
what?
This is insane - sanity replaced by self-interest.
but self-interest is so deceptive - self-deceptive,
as self-deceptive as any insanity is.
now,
you
won't
reply
to this.
now,
now
this
is.
this
is
this.
now, this is not a tautology.
actually, it's a lie.
the "nature" of syntax speaks an ambiguity in our language-intoxicated minds.
the second "this" is not the first "this."
therefore, it must not be the same.
or is it?
you think it is, but you know it's not.
you know it is, but you think it's not.
this is
not this.
this seems like it must be the lie, but it's not.
ignore this ":reality."
ignore this.
ignore this this.
ignore this "this."
ignore "this."
Access: Public
Print
views (95)